← All stories

Safety Academy · Story 08 · Liquidity rug pulls

Real exchange. Removable floor.

ROCKET has a pool on Uniswap. Ken asks who can empty it.

Estimated 5 min read

LIQUIDITY RUG PULLS6 scenes

A new token has a pool on Uniswap.

Ken follows a ROCKET promotion to its pool on Uniswap. The pool shows 20,000 USDC alongside ROCKET, and he considers buying 300 USDC worth. The venue is real.

Ken
“The exchange is real. So this token is checked?”
Illustration: A new token has a pool on Uniswap.

The exchange and the token are separate trust decisions.

One person controls most of the liquidity.

The creator supplied most of the assets available for swaps. That stake is a liquidity position, and the scammer can normally withdraw its share. A real exchange does not certify every token or pool on it.

The Scammer
“The exit is under my management.”
Illustration: One person controls most of the liquidity.

Liquidity providers can normally withdraw their positions. Control and restrictions need independent checks.

The “locked liquidity” badge has no evidence.

Ken asks about withdrawals. The promoter sends a “liquidity locked” screenshot, but no independently verifiable position or unlock time. A padlock picture is carrying the whole argument.

Ken
“A padlock picture is doing a lot of work here.”
Illustration: The “locked liquidity” badge has no evidence.

A claim of locked liquidity is not proof that the relevant position is actually locked.

Captain Harold shows what a withdrawal could change.

Captain Harold shows what removing most liquidity would do: buyers could have much less capacity to sell at the old price. The number on a chart is not a guaranteed cash-out offer.

Captain Harold
“A real exchange. A floor someone else can remove.”
Illustration: Captain Harold shows what a withdrawal could change.

A price on a chart is not a promise that you can cash out at that price.

Ken asks for evidence and declines the rush.

Ken checks liquidity ownership and lock evidence separately from token rules and owner powers. The evidence is insufficient, so he declines the rushed 300 USDC purchase.

Ken
“Show the position. Not another rocket emoji.”
Illustration: Ken asks for evidence and declines the rush.

Even a genuine lock does not remove other token or market risks.

The creator never receives his 300 USDC.

His 300 USDC never enters the pool. A genuine lock would still leave other token and market risks. The scammer is left explaining why his swimming pool has a carrying handle.

Ken
“Real exchange. Unproven token. Easy decision.”
Illustration: The creator never receives his 300 USDC.

The habit: assess the token and its liquidity, not just the website hosting the trade.

The useful bit

The real exchange can host a pool whose creator can pull the liquidity.

  1. A real exchange does not check the tokens on it. Ask who controls the money in the pool and whether a 'lock' can be verified.
  2. Check the token's own rules and owner powers as a separate question.
  3. The chart price is not your exit price. No evidence, no rush, no trade.

I already did this

If liquidity disappeared after your purchase, do not chase the old chart price with more deposits or repeated failing swaps. Preserve transaction records and follow Uniswap’s reporting guidance. A report cannot guarantee your money returns.

Sources & further reading